Legal Opinion
Leake v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Tompkins, J.
The underlying dispute in this case is a claim that Todd E. Leake, a former broker with Merrill Lynch, left with custom*104ers and trade secrets for a competitor, Prudential Securities.1 Petitioner has brought this application to compel respondent Merrill Lynch to proceed to arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause in his employment agreement with Merrill Lynch in an expeditious manner and to enjoin Merrill Lynch from commencing or prosecuting claims in this regard in any other forum.
Petitioner has sought arbitration before the National Association of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Norris v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Davis v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994