Legal Opinion

Davis v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jane S. Solomon, J.

Petitioner Paul W. Davis (Davis) moves to compel "expedited arbitration” before the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD) of a dispute arising out of his employment with respondent Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch) and to enjoin Merrill Lynch from initiating litigation related to the dispute in any other forum.1 Merrill Lynch cross-moves to dismiss on the grounds that the parties’ agreement does not provide for expedited arbitration and that the injunction Davis seeks is prohibited. For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. General Atomic Co. v. FelterSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Flanagan v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Janmort Leasing, Inc. v. Econo-Car International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API