Legal Opinion

Crookston v. Fire Insurance Exchange

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1993No. 920172PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

This case is before us for the second time. In the first appeal, Crookston v. Fire Insurance Exchange, 817 P.2d 789, 806 (Utah 1991) (Crookston I), we affirmed a jury finding of fraud against defendant Fire Insurance Exchange and an award of $815,826 in compensatory damages to plaintiffs Spencer Larry Crookston and Randi Lynn Crookston. However, we also vacated the trial court’s denial of a motion by Fire Insurance for a new trial based on its claim that the $4,000,000 punitive damage award was excessive. Id. at 808. We remanded that motion so that the trial court could…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Terry v. Zions Cooperative Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. BakalovUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. LooseUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Diversified Holdings, L.C. v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API