Legal Opinion

Lamb v. B & B AMUSEMENTS CORP.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1993No. 910018PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Plaintiff Tammy Herring Lamb was injured when the third and fourth cars of a five-car children’s roller coaster in which she was riding separated. Apparently, the bolt connecting the cars failed. Lamb filed a complaint against B & B Amusements Corp., the operator of the amusement ride, for negligence in the maintenance and/or inspection of the roller coaster and Curtis Industries, Inc., the manufacturer of the bolt, for negligence and strict products liability. Lamb appeals a summary judgment in favor of Curtis and a jury verdict in favor of B & B. We reverse the summary…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Webster v. SillUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Barson v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mulherin v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Armco Steel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Siciliano v. Capitol City Shows, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wankier v. Crown Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. Dallas Market Center Development Co. v. LiedekerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Smith v. Four Corners Mental Health Center, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. K & T, INC. v. KoroulisUtah Supreme Court · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API