Legal Opinion

Northam v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 17, 1935No. 6 Div. 660PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

The complaint, as amended, consisting of only one count, is based upon an accident policy insuring against the “result of bodily injury suffered while the policy was in full force, and caused directly and independently of all other causes by violent and accidental means!” The sufficiency of the com plaint is not now questioned. The defendant pleaded, in short by consent, the general issue, with leave to give in evidence any matter which, if well pleaded, would be admissible in defense of the action. For convenience, the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Caldwell v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. Rock v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Cherokee Life Ins, Co. v. BrannumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Argonaut Southwest Insurance Company v. MaupinTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Zinn v. Equitable Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API