Legal Opinion

Olivier v. City of Fall River

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 26, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This is a petition by ten taxable inhabitants of the respondent city under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 40, *377§ 53, to prevent the payment to one Mooney of a pension after his retirement from the service of the city. Mooney had been employed as a laborer for thirty-six years when in June, 1932, at the age of sixty-four, he suffered injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. Under the workmen’s compensation act he was awarded compensation for two hundred sixty-eight weeks at the rate of $16.80 a week, which he has received. At the time of his injury he was entitled, under St. 1924, c.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Horrigan v. Mayor of PittsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Goodale v. County Commissioners of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the Governor & CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Lexington v. Town of BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Nichols v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Berube v. Selectmen of EdgartownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Ford v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Wachusett Regional School District Committee v. EricksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API