Legal Opinion
In Re the Marriage of O'Donnell-Lamont
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 20, 2003No. C98 1284 DR; A112960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*17EDMONDS, J.
Grandparents petition for reconsideration of our decision in this case. O’Donnell-Lamont and Lamont, 184 Or App 249, 56 P3d 929 (2002). All members of the court agree that we should allow the petition and modify our former opinion to state that the 2001 amendments to ORS 109.119 are fully retroactive. Five members believe that we should remand for further proceedings in the trial court; five members believe that we should not remand. We therefore deny the request that we remand by an equally divided court. The effect of this decision is that the previous decision as modified…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Matter of Marriage of MasseeOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Mitchell v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. LauffenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- In re the Marriage of ColsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Marriage of O'Donnell-LamontOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Weldon v. BallowCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
- Strome and StromeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- In Re the Marriage of O'Donnell-LamontCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003