Strome and Strome
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
This case is before us on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, Strome and Strome, 337 Or 555, 101 P3d 809 (2004), with instructions to reconsider it in light of the court’s decision in O’Donnell-Lamont and Lamont, 337 Or 86, 91 P3d 721 (2004), cert den, 543 US 1050, 125 S Ct 867, 160 L Ed 2d 770 (2005). In our original decision, we applied the 1997 version of Oregon’s third-party custody statute, ORS 109.119, and determined that paternal grandmother had not overcome the statutory presumption that favors legal parents in custody disputes. Accordingly, we reversed the trial court’s award of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Marriage of O'Donnell-LamontOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Jordan v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2005
- In the Matter of Marriage of O'donnell-Lamont and LamontCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Matter of Marriage of DennisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- In Re the Marriage of O'Donnell-LamontCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- KleinsasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Jensen v. BevardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- In Re the Marriage of NguyenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Muhlheim v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Pulley v. HerndonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023