Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of O'Donnell-Lamont

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 2003No. C98 1284 DR; A112960Published

1Opinion of the Court

67 P.3d 939 (2003)

187 Or. App. 14

In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Rayne Elizabeth O'DONNELL-LAMONT (deceased), Petitioner,

and

Michael David Lamont, Jr., Appellant, and

Christine O'Donnell, Patrick O'Donnell, and Darrell Miller, Respondents.

C98 1284 DR; A112960.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Petition for Reconsideration December 16, 2002.

Petition for Reconsideration December 18, 2002.

Petition for Reconsideration (Substituted) December 19, 2002.

Petition for Reconsideration December 20, 2002.

Resubmitted March 5, 2003.

Decided March 20, 2003.

Eli D. Stutsman, Portland, and David L. Heifetz, for petition.

P…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Deits; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Landau.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Matter of Marriage of MasseeOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API