Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Board of Education

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 21, 1983No. 81-0624; CA A25345PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Plaintiff, the former superintendent of defendant school district, brought this mandamus action against the district and the individual members of the district school board (defendants) to compel defendants to award him an employment contract for the 1981-82 school year. The trial court held that defendants had not timely notified plaintiff of his non-renewal for the 1981-82 school year as required by statute and were therefore required to employ him. From the resulting judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. We affirm.

Plaintiff was superintendent of schools of defendant school district…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ambrose v. Board of Education of School District 17-CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. McFeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Zidell Marine Corp. v. West Painting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. In Re the Marriage of O'Donnell-LamontCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. RothmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API