United States v. Mattio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
Without discussing the technical character of the proceeding, it is sufficient to say that by it the government seeks judgment forfeiting certain articles of jewelry alleged to have been brought into the United States in violation of the Tariff Act of 1922. A jury-was duly waived, and from an adverse judgment, based upon special findings of fact, the government appeals.
In November, 1923, two women, citizens of France, clandestinely entered the United States from Canada, by automobile, without reporting to any immigration official. In' good faith they were at the time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Keck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- International Railway Co. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- One Pearl Chain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- United States v. One Pearl NecklaceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
- United States v. ChesbroughDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1910
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. American Gas Screw Franz JosephDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1962
- Walter E. Von Kalinowski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Poland Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- State v. WashingtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.