United States v. Chesbrough
District Court, D. New Jersey
Indictment against Matilda H. Chesbrough for violation of the customs duties law.
1Opinion of the Court
RELLSTAB, District Judge.
The indictment in this case is based on section 3082, Rev. St. U. S. (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2014). The *780demurrer is to- the first three counts. On the argument the United States abandoned the first and third counts. The demurrant alleges that the second count does not charge a crime.
Section 3082., which furnishes the basis for all the counts, reads as follows:.'“If any person shall fraudulently or knowingly import or bring into the United States,' or assist in so doing, any merchandise, contrary to law,. or shall receive, conceal, buy, sell, or in any manner…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Keck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Cotzhausen v. NazroSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- One Pearl Chain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- Friedenstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. One Pearl NecklaceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Westor Theatres, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
- Sturges v. Clark D. Pease, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- United States v. SischoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- William L. Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. CaminataDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.