Legal Opinion

Runyon v. Board of Prison Terms & Paroles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1938No. Civ. 10519PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Respondents’ demurrer to appellant’s petition for a writ of mandate was sustained without leave to amend, and from the judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to the order made in that behalf this appeal has been taken.

The mandamus proceeding initiated by the filing of said petition involved the question of whether letters and other communications and documents which are sent volmv tarily by various individuals to the state board of prison terms and paroles in connection with the hearing and determination of applications for parol of prisoners in the state prisons, but which are not required…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Coldwell v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Colnon v. OrrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Spotton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In Re OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mathews v. PyleArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API