Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Smith

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2001No. 90388PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

The primary issue in this appeal is whether, in an automobile liability insurance policy, an “automobile business exclusion” violates the public policy of Illinois.

BACKGROUND

On September 21, 1995, Maurice Barnes, accompanied by Ruby Smith, drove his vehicle to Harrah’s Casino Cruises — Joliet (Harrah’s). Barnes gave his vehicle to the valet service at Harrah’s for parking. When Barnes and Smith left Harrah’s, Jeremy Fisher, a valet driver employed by Harrah’s, retrieved Barnes’ automobile. Smith has alleged that, as she entered the passenger door, the vehicle rolled backwards, striking her…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters GroupIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cummins v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. DeWitt v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Founders Insurance v. MunozIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Progressive Universal Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. General Casualty Insurance v. LaceyIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Secura Insurance v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Sensebe v. Canal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API