Legal Opinion
Judy Lynn Tahfs, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. William N. Proctor Miranda K. Proctor, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2003No. 00-1657, 01-1728, 01-1798PublishedCited by 351 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, Judy Lynn Tahfs, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the complaint Tahfs had filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against William N. Proctor and Miranda K. Proctor, alleging that they had acted in concert with staff members of the Wayne County, Michigan, Third Circuit Court to obtain personal protection orders that violated Tahfs’s First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
Tahfs also appeals from the district court’s order awarding the Proctors $6,865 in attorney fees, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by351 opinions
- Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Sister Michael Marie v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Gean v. HattawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Joseph A. Wittstock, III v. Mark A. Van Sile, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
346 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.