Legal Opinion

Loveman, Joseph & Loeb v. Himrod

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1932No. 6 Div. 177PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

Action on the casé for damages for malicious prosecution. Appellee, plaintiff in the court below, had judgment against appellant, upon a trial before the court, sitting without a jury, for the sum of $50.

Nothing is presented for our consideration other than the propriety, vel non, of the trial court, on the facts, so rendering judgment in favor of appellee.

Our manner of review of the ruling referred to, based upon the statutes, and the hold ing of the Supreme Court, is stated in McCreless v. State, 24 Ala. App. 229, 133 So. 313. We will not repeat it here. Neither do we see that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Penney v. WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Caldwell v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Collum Motor Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Askin & Marine Co. v. LoganAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Askin Marine Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API