Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 24, 1929No. 3 Div. 895PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The suit is for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment.

The evidence tends to show that a filling station belonging to appellee had been robbed, and money had been taken from the cash register. There were in the station at the time the manager of it, Mr. Jones, and a negro helper, Frank McNeal. Plaintiff was arrested by officers at the suggestion of Jones and McNeal, and carried to the filling station of defendant, and the evidence tends to show that Jones, while on his job, and because he was otherwise engaged, directed McNeal to swear out a warrant for his arrest. Plaintiff was kept in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City Delivery Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  2. Lunsford v. DietrichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Parisian Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Delchamps, Inc. v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Crown Cent. Petroleum Corp. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Glidden Co. v. LaneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Chatman v. Pizitz, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API