Askin & Marine Co. v. Logan
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
Under the decisions in McCarty v. Williams, 212 Ala. 232, 102 So. 133, and Wells Co. v. Lane, 22 Ala. App. 269, 115 So. 74, we must hold that counts 3, 4, and 5 state a good cause of action and are not subject to the grounds of demurrer assigned. The writer is of the opinion that proper consideration was not given to count C in McCarty v. Williams, supra, but that is “water that has gone under the bridge.” The suggestion is here made that the attention of the Supreme Court may again be directed to it. 38 Corpus Juris, 469 (130).
In actions for malicious prosecutions growing out of the suing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- City Delivery Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- Gilliam v. South, & North Alabama RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Southern Ry. Co. v. BeatySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Allison-Russell-Withington Co. v. SommersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glidden Co. v. LaneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- First Shelby Nat. Bank v. MitchellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Askin Marine Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Schwabacher v. HerringAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- Loveman, Joseph & Loeb v. HimrodAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.