Legal Opinion

City of Bixby v. State Ex Rel. Department of Labor

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 1996No. 86759PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Presiding Judge:

Appellant, City of Bixby (“City”), seeks review of the trial court’s December 11,1995, order which affirmed an order of Appellee, Department of Labor (“Department”). Ap-pellee Robin Springer (“Springer”), the former City Manager of City, was awarded $54,298.56 by Department for past-due wages and penalties thereon under 40 O.S. 1991, § 165.2 and § 165.3. The trial court affirmed Department’s order, concluding it did not prejudice the substantial rights of City under 75 O.S. 1991, § 322.

The April 3, 1995, order of Department found Springer was hired on September…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST NO. 1, McINTOSH CO. v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. City of Del City v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 114Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cable v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement BoardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Anderson v. State ex rel. CrawfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Red Rock Distributing Co. v. State ex rel. ReneauCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Cable v. POLICE AND PENSION RETIREMENT BD.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API