State v. Barrett
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Justice:
¶ 1 To resolve these consolidated petitions for extraordinary relief, we must determine whether a district court’s reduction, for sentencing purposes, of a first degree felony with a gang enhancement 1 to a second degree felony without an enhancement constitutes an impermissible two-degree reduction of the charged offense. If so, we must determine whether it is appropriate to utilize our extraordinary writ powers to nullify such a reduction. We conclude that a district court’s removal of a gang enhancement is, in effect, a one-degree reduction of the charged offense.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Miller v. WeaverUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Jackson Const. Co., Inc. v. MarrsUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LopesUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Renn v. Utah State Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HarkerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. RothlisbergerUtah Supreme Court · 2006
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.