Legal Opinion

Bicknell v. Randolph

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 27, 2004No. 99,594PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAY MITCHELL, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Darin Bicknell (Bicknell) appeals from an order of the trial court dismissing with prejudice his medical malpractice claim against Appellees John D. Randolph, M.D., Deborah McCollum, M.D., and James Brennan, M.D. (collectively Physicians) pursuant to 12 O.S.2001 § 1083 and Rule 9, Rules for the District Court, 12 O.S.’ Ch. 2, App. We find this case is controlled by the similar decision in Boston v. Buchanan, 2003 OK 114, 89 P.3d 1034. We thus reverse the order dismissing the action pursuant to § 1083, and remand for the trial court to determine,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Boston v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nelson v. MERCY HEALTH CENTER, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  2. Gugello v. Select Specialty Hospital-Tulsa, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. MCCAMEY v. MEDICAL CENTERS OF OKLAHOMA, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  4. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. KINDLECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  5. MCCAMEY v. MEDICAL CENTERS OF OKLAHOMA, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API