Legal Opinion

Marks v. Whitney

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1971No. S. F. 22566PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCOMB, J.

This is a quiet title action to settle a boundary line dispute caused by overlapping and defective surveys and to enjoin defendants (herein “Whitney”) from asserting any claim or right in or to the property Of plaintiff Marks. The unique feature here is that a part of Marks’ property is tidelands acquired under an 1874 patent issued pursuant to the Act of March 28, 1868 (Stats. 1867-68, ch. 415, p. 507); a small portion of these tidelands adjoins almost the entire shoreline of Whitney’s upland property. ■ Marks asserted complete ownership of the tidelands and the right to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation v. Air Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. San Diego Unified Port District, and Air Transport Association of America, Intervening v. Adriana GianturcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API