Legal Opinion
Auditorium Ventilating Corp. v. Greater Rochester Properties, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 31, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
In this suit in equity we are concerned with the asserted infringement by defendant of two United States letters patent owned by plaintiff; the first (16,611) granted to Leo L. Lewis by reissue on May 3,1927, for method and apparatus for cooling and ventilating, and the second (1,670,656) for a ventilating system to Walter L. Fleisher, granted May 22, 1928. Both these patents were assigned to plaintiff in December, 1927. The typical claims of the Lewis patent, to which I shall make further reference, are 13 and 14 (though 8, 10, 13, 14, and 17 are also involved), and of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Parsons Non-Skid Co. v. Atlas Chain Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Wright Co. v. Herring-Curtiss Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fauber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
- McKay Co. v. Shott Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1937
- Autokraft Box Corp. v. Nu-Box Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
- Auditorium Conditioning Corp. v. Warner Bros. PicturesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935