Legal Opinion

Autokraft Box Corp. v. Nu-Box Corp.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1936No. 885PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

This is a bill in equity charging infringement of letters patent No. 1,646,563 issued October 25, 1927, to Stokes & Smith Company on an application filed April 8, 1926, by John R. Sonneborn. The plaintiff is the assignee and owner of the patent.

The patent relates to apparatus and methods for wrapping boxes. The following claims of the patent are in issue: 3, 4, 5, 8, 13, and 14 relating to a wrapping method; 15 and 16 relating to a “biasing” method; 20 and 39 relating to apparatus.

By disclaimer filed after suit was instituted, the wrapping method claims were limited to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright Co. v. Herring-Curtiss Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  2. Shelby Steel Tube Co. v. Delaware Seamless Tube Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Delaware Seamless Tube Co. v. Shelby Steel Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
  4. Corrugated Fiber Co. v. Paper Working Machines Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1919
  5. Auditorium Ventilating Corp. v. Greater Rochester Properties, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Autokraft Box Corp. v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API