State v. Crisp
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendant contends the court erred to his prejudice in submitting to the jury the possible verdict of involuntary manslaughter. Resolution of this question requires a two-step analysis: (1) whether the evidence in the record will support a verdict of involuntary manslaughter, and (2) if not, whether erroneous submission of the possible verdict was prejudicial error.
Our Supreme Court had defined involuntary manslaughter as “the unintentional killing of a human being without either express or implied malice (1) by some unlawful act not amounting to a felony or naturally dangerous…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. WrennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. FournierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. ConcepcionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. ConcepcionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988