Legal Opinion

State v. Concepcion

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 8, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

111 N.J. 373 (1988)

545 A.2d 119

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

MIGUEL ANGEL CONCEPCION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 3, 1988.

Decided August 8, 1988.

Michael Critchley argued the cause for appellant (Critchley & Roche, attorneys, Michael Critchley, Luanne M. Peterpaul, and Donald J. McCauley, on the brief).

Boris Moczula, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey).

2Per curiam

Defendant, Miguel Concepcion, was convicted of reckless manslaughter, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:11-4(b)(1). He was sentenced to…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Handler; Concurrence · Handler.

3Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. State v. ConcepcionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API