State v. Tidwell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Defendant contends that she is entitled to a new trial due to (1) repeated instances of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, (2) denial of her right to effective assistance of counsel, (3) the trial court’s refusal to give a requested jury instruction, and (4) the court’s failure to submit the lesser offense of involuntary manslaughter as a possible verdict. Defendant’s latter two contentions have merit and we conclude that she is entitled to a new trial. We do not address her other contentions because they concern matters which may not arise at a new trial.
Defendant requested the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Barnard v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. BetheaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. ClappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.