National Surety Corp. v. Sharpe
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarNhill, J.
The order entered in effect extended the receivership to include the property belonging to the defendants individually. It was made to appear that the debts of the partnership alone are many times in excess of the value of the partnership property. The only exception in the record is to the “entering and signing order dated January 24, 1951.” It is presumed that the court found facts sufficient to support his order. Hall v. Coach Co., 224 N.C. 781, 32 S.E. 2d 325; Craver v. Spaugh, 227 N.C. 129, 41 S.E. 2d 82. The judgment is regular in form and no error is made to appear on the face of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Craver v. . SpaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Russos v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Roach v. . PritchettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Hall v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bond v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Coulbourn v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. RaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Bond v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952