Legal Opinion

Bond v. Bond

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 11, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

Tbe exception to tbe judgment entered presents for decision only two questions: (1) Do tbe facts found support tbe judgment, and (2) does any error of law appear upon tbe face of tbe record? Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N.C. 537, 35 S.E. 2d 609; Simmons v. Lee, 230 N.C. 216, 53 S.E. 2d 79, and cases cited; Surety Corp. v. Sharpe, 233 N.C. 642, 65 S.E. 2d 138; S. v. Raynor, ante, p. 184.

Upon tbe findings made, tbe court correctly denied tbe motion for alimony pendente lite. But tbe cause was before tbe court for bearing of tbat motion only. It is so recited in tbe judgment. “It was not before tbe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Simmons v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Briggs v. BriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bond v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API