Legal Opinion
Harness v. Wallace
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 21, 2005No. 26653PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES K. PREWITT, Judge.
Jackie Wallace and Linda Wallace (“Appellants”) appeal the judgment of the trial court entered on October 8, 2004, in favor of Carl Harness and Caroline Harness (“Respondents”). Respondents sought title to property by adverse possession.
Appellate review in this non-jury case requires that the judgment be affirmed unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, it is against the weight of the evidence, or unless it erroneously declares or applies the law. Schaefer v. Rivers, 965 S.W.2d 954, 956 (Mo.App.1998). The trial court’s judgment is presumed valid, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Teson v. VasquezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Kitterman v. SimrallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Flowers v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Conduff v. StoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Schaefer v. RiversMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Scheck Industrial Corporation v. Tarlton Corporation, Defendant/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Martens v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Williams v. FrymireMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Kelley v. Widener Concrete Construction, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Warren v. DunlapMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.