Legal Opinion

Conduff v. Stone

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1998No. 21603PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRISON, Presiding Judge.

Rex and Diana Conduff (“Plaintiffs”) brought suit to quiet title to a 192-foot-wide strip of land (the “disputed tract”) between their property and that of George and Barbara Stone (“Defendants”). The trial court found for Plaintiffs, and enjoined Defendants from entering, occupying, or interfering with Plaintiffs’ use of the disputed tract. Defendants appeal. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs and Defendants own adjoining properties in rural Newton County. Plaintiffs’ land lies directly north of Defendants’ land. For many years, a fence (the “old fence”) stood 192…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Kitterman v. SimrallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Tillman v. HutchersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Rice v. JamesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Podlesak v. WesleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Flowers v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Smith v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  4. Underwood v. HashMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. McCord v. GatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API