Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Rivers

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1998No. 21759PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Plaintiffs, as sellers, and Defendants, as purchasers, entered into a contract for the sale of real estate. Plaintiffs contended that Defendants breached the agreement by refusing to purchase the property and sought as liquidated damages the amount of a deposit made by Defendants in conjunction with the contract. Following non-jury trial, judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiffs for the relief sought. Defendants appeal.

Appellate review of a non-jury case is provided in Rule 73.01(c). As that rule is construed, the judgment of the trial court is to be affirmed unless there is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bethell v. PorterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Gee v. GeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Brazell v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Nail Boutique, Inc. v. ChurchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Gundaker v. TemplerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Houston v. CriderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. R.J.S. Security, Inc. v. Command Security Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Underwood v. HashMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Williams v. FrymireMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Harness v. WallaceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API