Apotex, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Goldberg, District Judge
This antitrust ease involves allegations that four reverse-payment settlement agreements entered into by a brand-name drug manufac*224turer and four generic drug companies constitute antitrust violations under the Sherman Act.1 Apotex, Inc,, a generic competitor, and other Plaintiffs claim that these settlement agreements were created and signed with the purpose of delaying the market entry of generic versions of the brand-name pharmaceutical, Provigil. Defendants maintain that the agreements were legitimate settlements of Hatch-Waxman patent litigation…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- 10X Genomics, Inc. v. Parse Biosciences, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- CHATOM PRIMARY CARE, P.C. v. MERCK & CO., INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- FinancialApps, LLC v. Envestnet, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- Graco Inc. v. Carlisle Construction Materials, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Lee v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.