Legal Opinion

CHATOM PRIMARY CARE, P.C. v. MERCK & CO., INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 3, 2023No. 2:12-cv-03555Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: MERCK MUMPS VACCINE : ANTITRUST LITIGATION : : CIVIL ACTION : Master File No. 12-3555 : : : THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: : ALL ACTIONS : MEMORANDUM Kenney, J. July 27, 2023 Chatom Primary Care, P.C., Andrew Klein, M.D., and John I. Sutter, M.D. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this proposed class action on behalf of direct purchasers of Defendant Merck & Co., Inc.’s (“Merck”) mumps vaccines. Plaintiffs’ remaining claims allege that they were overcharged for Merck’s mumps vaccines as a result of Merck’s unlawful…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API