Legal Opinion
Homeco Developments v. Markborough Properties, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided March 3, 1989No. 85-8661-CIVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MERRILL LYNCH’S AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, Chief Judge.
Defendant Merrill Lynch has filed an amended motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint. Because the court vacated its previous order dismissing the case, the court now entertains this motion to dismiss.
The defendant’s first argument supporting its motion to dismiss is that the plaintiffs lack the capacity to sue. Although organizations such as unincorporated associations lack the capacity to sue, entities such as partnerships and limited partnerships are not necessarily precluded from suing.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- G.M. Brod & Company, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. U.S. Home Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. AustinDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
- Davis v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- Cooper v. J.J. Marsh, Inc.Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1991