Burger King Corp. v. Austin
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOEVELER, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Counter-Defendant Burger King Corporation’s (“BKC”) Motions: (1) to Dismiss Defendants’ (“Austins”) First Amended Counterclaim (“Counterclaim”); and (2) to Strike Defendants’ Prayer for Damages in the Counterclaim. Also pending is Austins’ Appeal from Magistrate Judge Bandstra’s Order dated November 30, 1990.
I. BACKGROUND
Austins were franchisees of two Burger King restaurants. As a result of their nonpayment of royalties, advertising and sales promotion expenses, and rents as provided by the Franchise Agreements, BKC terminated…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Quality Foods De Centro America, S.A. And Duroparts De El Salvador, S.A. v. Latin American Agribusiness Development Corporation, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Crim Truck & Tractor Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Johnson v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- McDonald's Corp. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Barnes v. Burger King Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- Shibata v. LimDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2000
- Holiday Inns Franchising, Inc. v. BranstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. Dole Food Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.