Legal Opinion
Roeder v. General Signal Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 20, 1995No. 6:95-cv-06027PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Irving A. Roeder (“Roeder”), filed a complaint on January 13, 1995, alleging that defendants, General Signal Corporation and Lightnin, illegally terminated him because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.) and the New York Human Rights Law (Executive Law §§ 290 et seq.). In the fourth cause of action, Roeder pleads a claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), alleging that defendants discriminated and retaliated against him, in violation of 29 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Russell v. Northrop Grumman Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Thomson v. Saatchi & Saatchi Holdings (USA), Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Herman v. Time Warner Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Conroy v. High Peaks Dental Professional PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- Snyder, M.D. v. Neurological Surgery Practice of Long Island, PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025