Legal Opinion
Russell v. Northrop Grumman Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 29, 1996No. 95 Civ. 1500PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum, and Order
SEYBERT, District Judge:
On April 14,1995, plaintiff Charles Russell commenced this action alleging a violation of Section 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and seeking a judgment (1) awarding compensatory damages for lost benefits and for lost earnings from the date of his dismissal, September 23, 1993, to the day of the entry of judgment; (2) ordering defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation to reinstate plaintiff to his rightful position and to restore retroactively the benefits of plaintiffs employment, including his pension plan; (3) awarding…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jerome SANDBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KPMG PEAT MARWICK, LLP, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Strougo Ex Rel. Brazil Fund, Inc. v. Scudder, Stevens & Clark, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Warner v. Buck Creek Nursery, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
- Giordano v. ThomsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Beckett v. Atlas Air, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.