Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Harper

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1923No. 6 Div. 830PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a common-law writ of certiorari to review the decree of the circuit court in a cause brought under the Workmen's Compensation Act. Gen. Acts 1919, pp. 206-239.

The facts set up by the pleading are that defendants, Guy V. and Caine O'Rear, were engaged in operating a coal mine near Carbon Hill, and that petitioner, on August 27, 1921, while performing his duties in and about the mine, wrenched, sprained, or strained his back, of which fact he failed to notify defendants for the reason, as stated in the complaint, he was informed by defendants' physician that he was suffering from kidney…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haiselden v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Peterson v. Fisher Body Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grimes v. Stith Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Ex Parte Big Four Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. B. M. Pulliam v. Gulf Lumber Company, Inc. And Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Webb v. National Pipe & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. KeefeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API