Legal Opinion

Lovett v. Manchester Street Railway

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 2, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The defendant maintains and operates a double track trolley line centrally located on Elm street in the city of Manchester. The street runs north and south, and is between eighty and ninety feet wide between curbs. The trolley wires were originally supported by a line of iron poles situated between the two tracks. These poles were located pursuant to a license granted the defendant by the board of mayor and aldermen on April 19, 1895, in accordance with P. S., c. 81, s. 2; P. L., c. 97, s. 2. In 1928 it was decided to substitute for the “so called center construction” a curb or side line…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stevens v. United Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  2. Derosier v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  3. Burke v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  4. Ela v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
  5. Cook v. New DurhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carbone v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  2. Smith v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  3. Peppin v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  4. Panagoulis v. Philip Morris & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  5. Bruton v. Leavitt Stores Corp'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API