Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1968No. 1546PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

This criminal appeal is from a conviction for the crime of robbery with a prior conviction. Since the matters raised have been repeatedly passed upon by this Court, they will be, in the main, disposed of summarily.

Appellant urges that he was not assigned counsel prior to his preliminary examination. As to this, we have held that unless there is a showing of prejudice, there is no error. State v. Smith, 99 Ariz. 106, 407 P.2d 74; State v. Mangrum, 98 Ariz. 279, 403 P.2d 925.

Appellant urges that the assistant county attorney committed prejudicial error in his argument to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. OwenArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. FurthWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State v. SimoneauArizona Supreme Court · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. SustaitaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. FieldsArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. McGriffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. RhodesArizona Supreme Court · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API