Legal Opinion

State v. Sustaita

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1978No. 4092-PRPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Justice.

We granted petitions for review (Rule 31.19, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.) of the decisions and opinion of the Court of Appeals in two consolidated cases which affirmed as to the defendant Paul Montez Sustaita and reversed as to the defendant Paul Rodriguez Gonzales.

Defendant Sustaita appealed from a verdict and judgment of guilt to the crime of assault with intent to commit sodomy, A.R.S. § 13-252, and sodomy, A.R.S. § 13-651. Defendant Gonzales appealed from a verdict and judgment of guilt to the crime of assault with intent to commit sodomy, A.R.S. §…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Nelson v. O'NEILSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court · 1969

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsonArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. HallmanArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. RunningeagleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API