Legal Opinion

State v. Simoneau

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1965No. 1429PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

Appellant, Harold W. Simoneau, was charged with committing the crimes of robbery and attempted robbery in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-641 and 13-108, respectively. The causes were consolidated for trial and appellant was convicted of both crimes, receiving fifteen to twenty years for robbery and eight to ten years for at tempted robbery, the terms to run consecutively.

At 1:00 a. m. on March 19, 1963, Samuel Veltri, the manager of Starr’s Liquor Store was confronted by an. undisguised gunman who demanded and received the contents of the store cash register. On…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. OwenArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. KingArizona Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew PayneArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. GoodyearArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. ShingArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. DoddArizona Supreme Court · 1966

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API