Legal Opinion

State v. Furth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1940No. 27956PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

The prosecuting attorney of King county filed an information April 22, 1939, charging Oscar Furth with commission of the crime of petit larceny in King county, April 19, 1939. Trial of the defendant to a jury resulted in verdict June 12, 1939, of guilty as charged.

The prosecuting attorney filed a supplemental information August 18, 1939, charging defendant was an habitual criminal by reason of two prior convictions of crime. The cause was stricken from the trial calendar and an amended supplemental information filed November 20, 1939, accusing Oscar Furth, as follows, of being an habitual…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. Le PitreWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. People v. ReeseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Levell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. State v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. HaggardIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API