Bernosky v. Greff
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,
Appellant contends that when a passenger is injured by reason of that vehicle’s leaving the highway and colliding with a pole, this passenger makes out a case of negligence against the driver by proving that the latter just before the accident fell asleep at the wheel. The court below charged the jury in effect that the mere fact that a driver of a car falls asleep at the wheel is not proof of negligence unless his falling asleep is due to his failure to take proper care and due caution and that he would be guilty of negligence only if just before falling…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Blood v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Cooper v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Frank v. MarkleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HugginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Siruta Ex Rel. Heirs at Law of Siruta v. SirutaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Commonwealth v. CatheySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. PedotaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Spivak v. HeywardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.