Legal Opinion

In Re Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1957No. Crim. 5841PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The petitioner was convicted of grand theft, and on February 28, 1951, the superior court suspended pronouncement of judgment and admitted petitioner to probation for a period of five years. Conditions imposed on probation include a provision that petitioner spend “the first two years of the probationary period” in the county jail, and make restitution as proposed by the probation officer, the total amount of which was in excess of $16,000. Petitioner’s motion for a new trial was denied, an appeal was taken, resulting in an affirmance. (People v. Davis, 112 Cal.App.2d 286 [246 P.2d 160], July…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. In Re KennickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. People v. BagleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API