Legal Opinion
In Re Kennick
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 1982No. Crim. 41144PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COMPTON, J.
This petition for habeas corpus was transferred by the Supreme Court to this court and the Sheriff of Los Angeles County was ordered to show cause why the writ should not be granted. We calendared the matter for oral argument. After considering the record and the circumstances of the case we have concluded that the writ should be denied.
Petitioner was convicted in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County of four counts of grand theft. Proceedings were suspended and he was placed on probation for a period of three years on condition that he serve the first year in the county…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- In Re StallingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- In Re DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. David William MerchantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re BakkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Gary Kennick v. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- People v. MarianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- In re MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.