Legal Opinion

In Re Osslo

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1958No. Crim. 6295Published

1Opinion of the Court

51 Cal.2d 371 (1958)

334 P.2d 1

In re MAX OSSLO and ARTHUR L. MEYER, on Habeas Corpus.

Docket No. Crim. 6295.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

December 23, 1958.

Charles P. Scully and Thomas Whelan for Petitioners.

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, James Don Keller, District Attorney (San Diego) and Claude B. Brown, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

SCHAUER, J.

By application for habeas corpus petitioners Osslo and Meyer ask that they be relieved of the assertedly illegal restraint of probation orders and that the superior court be required…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Adamson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Moore v. DempseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Chessman v. TeetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API