Legal Opinion
Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. Eiseman
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 19, 2014PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
These consolidated Right-to-Know Law (RTKL)1 petitions for review implicate multiple issues regarding third-party records. The Office of Open Records (OOR) ordered disclosure of the rates managed care organizations (MCOs) paid to subcontractors, and the rates subcontractors paid to providers of dental services under the Department of Public Welfare’s (DPW) administration of the Medicaid program in Southeast Pennsylvania. Although DPW is a party to contracts with the five MCOs that serve Southeast Pennsylvania, DPW does not directly contract with the subcontractors or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- SWB YANKEES LLC v. WintermantelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Allegheny County Department of Administrative Services v. A Second Chance, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Office of the Governor v. BariCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Barkeyville Borough v. StearnsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. EisemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. EisemanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. EisemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Wishnefsky v. Pa. Dep't of Corr.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- UnitedHealthcare of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. BaronCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.