Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Eiseman
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 19, 2014PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
This fact-intensive Right-to-Know Law (RTKL)1 petition for review from a final determination of the Office of Open Records (OOR) implicates rate-setting in the managed care industry.2 OOR ordered disclosure of rates set by contracts related to the Department of Public Welfare’s (DPW) administration of the Medicaid program. DPW asserted the rates were exempt under the Pennsylvania Uniform Trade Secrets Act, 12 Pa.C.S. §§ 5301-5308, (Trade Secrets Act), agency regulations and exceptions under the RTKL, including Section 708(b)(ll) of the RTKL, 65 P.S. § 67.708(b)(ll),…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- National Parks and Conservation Association v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary, Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Food and Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Office of the Governor v. ScolforoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Wilmington Star-News, Inc. v. New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- McGowan v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Department of Labor & Industry v. HeltzelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. EisemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- West Chester University of PA v. B. Schackner and The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, and Bravo Group, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. EisemanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.